American’s New York To Tokyo Flight Diverts To Dallas… After 12+ Hours

Flights divert all the time, for a variety of reasons. However, this is definitely one of the more eye-catching diversions that we’ve seen in some time.

American 787 flies from New York to Dallas in 12+ hours

This incident happened yesterday (March 31, 2025), and involves American flight AA167, scheduled to fly from New York (JFK) to Tokyo (HND). The flight was operated by an eight-year-old Boeing 787-9 with the registration code N829AN.

The flight was scheduled to depart at 10:37AM and arrive at 2PM the following day, with a total block time of 14hr23min. However, that’s not how this flight turned out. The flight took off more or less on schedule, at 10:59AM, and began its 6,772-mile trek.

Initially, the aircraft flew over North America, passing just south of Vancouver, and then started its crossing of the Pacific Ocean. However, just under seven hours after takeoff, the jet made a u-turn, and started flying east again.

The plane didn’t divert to Seattle, the nearest major airport in the United States. It also didn’t divert to New York, its origin. Instead, the plane diverted to Dallas (DFW). It touched down there at 10:12PM local time, 12hr13min after it took off. In total, the plane covered a distance of 6,656 miles, just under 100 miles short of the direct air distance between New York and Tokyo.

Passengers on that flight were put up in hotels near DFW for the night, given $12 meal vouchers (lol), and were rebooked on a replacement flight for the following day (today, April 1, 2025). They’re expected to arrive in Tokyo at 3:20PM on April 2, a little over 25 hours behind schedule.

What’s the logic for a diversion like this?

Logically, most people struggle with understanding a scenario like this. The jet was roughly half way to its destination. So what’s the logic for diverting to a completely different airport that isn’t the origin, the destination, or even the closest diversion point?

According to a Reddit user who was on the flight, shortly before the plane turned around, one of the pilots announced that there was a malfunction with the wings’ anti-freeze mechanism. So it didn’t pose an immediate risk to the flight (or else a diversion would’ve been made to the nearest point), but presumably this would’ve become a bigger issue later in the flight, or on subsequent flights.

So American did what airlines do more often than passengers would think. While it was obviously massively inconvenient for passengers, the plane was flown to American’s largest hub, as that gives the airline the most opportunity to regroup and recover its operation:

• DFW is a major maintenance base for the airline, so that the plane could be fixed there
• American presumably has the most spare aircraft and crews in DFW, to operate a replacement flight
• It’s easy for American to accommodate passengers at DFW with hotels and to provide customer service support, in terms of being properly staffed

So yeah, this was no doubt inconvenient, but I suspect American figured this was a better outcome than diverting to Seattle, for example. The airline probably wouldn’t have had a replacement crew there, maintenance would have been a lot more complicated, etc.

Bottom line

An American Boeing 787 operated a 12+ hour flight from New York to Dallas. The flight was supposed to fly to Tokyo, but around seven hours after takeoff, while over the Pacific Ocean, a maintenance issue arose. As a result, the plane needed to divert.

Clearly American wanted to focus on operational integrity as much as possible with this diversion, which explains why the airline chose to divert to its largest hub. You certainly don’t board a New York to Tokyo flight expecting that you’ll spend the night in Dallas.

What do you make of this American diversion?